Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Family Adaptability

Golzar Tajalli, Somayeh Sabaghi Renani,
Volume 8, Issue 1 (4-2021)
Abstract

Introduction: Triangulation is a term referring to the coalition of a child or a third party with one parent against the other parent.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to anticipate triangulation based on the dimensions of family adaptability, coherence, personality characteristics of oneself and the spouse, as well as the emotional experiences of the spouse among married women of Isfahan. 
Method: The research was conducted in a descriptive-correlational method, and the population of the study included married women from Isfahan in 2019. The sample of the study were 220 Isfahanian married women who were selected by availability sampling. The research instruments were FACES-IV coherence and family adoption questionnaire (Olson et al., 2006), triangulation (Bahrami & Yousefy, 2017), Five-Factor Model (FFM) on the recognition of the spouse (Shah Mohammadi & Yousefy, 2017), and emotional experience with spouse (Ghafrolahi and Yousefy, 2018). The data collected were analyzed through SPSS-22 software.
Results: The results of the regression analysis revealed a meaningful correlation between triangulation and negative emotions (35.016), unrestrained cohesion (0.138), spouse conscience (0.327), strict adaptability (-0.587), female neurosis (0.607), positive emotions (-0.528), irregular adaptation (-0.248).
Conclusion: The results of the present study could be applied to identify triangulation in couples counseling and accordingly employ either prevention or intervention methods.

Fatemeh Sadat Hashemizadeh, Seyed Hamid Atashpour, Hadi Farhadi,
Volume 11, Issue 6 (1-2025)
Abstract

 Introduction: Marital conflict is an important factor in family instability, and women often suffer more from marital conflicts. Therefore, paying attention to the components that can help women cope with these challenges is necessary. Among these components are family adaptability and mental well-being, which play a crucial role in addressing the problems within their marital relationships.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Paradox Time-Table Cure and the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Matrix on family adaptability and mental well-being in women experiencing marital conflicts.
Method: The study used a quasi-experimental design with pre-test, post-test, and follow-up stages. It included 45 women with marital conflicts, divided into two experimental groups (15 each) receiving Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or Paradox Time-Table Cure over ten sessions, and a control group (15) with no intervention. Assessments used the Olson (1985) Family Adaptability Questionnaire and Ryff (2002) Psychological Well-Being Scale, with data analyzed variance repeated measures and post hoc Bonferroni tests.
Results: The findings showed that the Paradox Time-Table Cure and matrix of acceptance and commitment therapy were both effective on family adaptability compared to the control group. However, the efficacy of paradox therapy was higher (p=0.000). Also, the results for the mental well-being variable found only the acceptance and commitment matrix treatment to be effective and the Paradox Time-Table Cure had no effect on this component (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The results showed that both methods of Paradox Time-Table Cure and matrix of acceptance and commitment therapy were effective in increasing family adaptability. But in the component of mental well-being, only the acceptance and commitment treatment matrix had a positive effect.



Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb